Let’s face it: it’s going to be a rough time for gender equity over the next four years, if not longer. In my private practice as a therapist, just days after the election, I saw a clear uptick in violent and threatening behavior toward my domestic violence clients. This may have just been coincidence, but I wondered. Suddenly, a very old threat was a new threat again.
This article from Reuters, Women’s Rights Face a Daunting New Year Worldwide, Campaigners Warn, lays out clearly where and how movements for gender equality will be hurting in the coming years. Work to end violence against women is going to face major challenges, as will work to keep access to contraception and abortion available. And the list goes on.
The Reuters article notes that the U.S. played a key role in forwarding gender equity agendas in recent years, particularly in “helping draw up global development goals approved by the United Nations, one of which calls for gender equality by 2030.” But things are going to change, and the U.S. may no longer be playing that key role.
With Donald Trump as our leader, the U.S. may no longer be the global leaders in setting the agenda and moving things forward for gender equity. The frontrunners on gender equity may hail from other nations, as we stave off the flood of rollbacks that the Trump administration and conservative allies will now try to carry out.
Still, the work will continue in the U.S., and it may even grow stronger. We have already seen The Women Donors Network step up boldly to lead in funding for vulnerable populations, and we will likely see more strong leadership moves from the Harnisch Foundation, the Ms. Foundation, the NoVo Foundation, Women Moving Millions, and community-based women’s funds across the country. Historically, women’s funds and feminist foundations have taken an inclusive approach to tackling social issues, seeking to bring in and advocate for other marginalized groups, including people of all races and sexual orientations. This role will likely develop further as we see progressive coalitions grow to defend human and civil rights.
There is already a strong coalition forming to march in Washington, D.C. on January 21, and more marches and protests are being planned. We will highlight that event and others like it here on Philanthropy Women, particularly as they relate to funding for women and girls.
We will also be following corporate giving for gender equality, and will find out which corporations will maintain and grow their focus on women in this new political era. We hope to see good things continuing for women’s empowerment at the corporate foundation level and will be tracking that work closely.
Hello again, world. It’s me, Kiersten. I’ve decided to develop a new website to help you become a healthier, more peaceful, and more secure place. It’s called Philanthropy Women.
For the past two years, I have been writing about women in philanthropy for Inside Philanthropy. It has been a wonderful and eye-opening experience, and has inspired me to take my own interest in women and philanthropy to a self-sustaining level.
More women are discovering the value of their perspective in philanthropy and are leading the way with better solutions to big social problems. Philanthropy Women seeks to magnify and amplify these women and their allies, so that we can help guide efforts at making our world more sane and whole.
Philanthropy Women aims to be a hub for news and information about women donors and their allies. We will be covering news about funding — both the givers and the getters of grants for women and girls. We will be talking a lot about women-driven grantmaking strategies. We will be watching where the money is flowing in philanthropy for gender equality, with a particular eye toward analyzing why money is going in certain directions, and how effective that grantmaking appears to be.
Please subscribe for free daily updates (upper right corner of the page), and you will receive an email once a day with the day’s new posts. For advertisers, we are offering competitive rates for prime visibility in our sidebar. For foundations and nonprofits in philanthropy, we also have a job board where you can advertise jobs in philanthropy.
Thanks for joining me on this unprecedented journey into highlighting and understanding the growing role of women in philanthropy. I hope you enjoy the ride.
I wrote this profile of Donna Hall, President and CEO of the Women Donors Network, in February of 2016, but now it seems truer than ever. With the recent news that the Women Donors Network is partnering with Solidaire to lead a funding effort aimed at defending vulnerable people against a hostile government, the Women Donors Network is, again, not picking the easy fights, and going boldly into terrain that other, larger foundations seems to be approaching more hesitantly.
Listening to Donna Hall, who has been leading the Women Donors Network (WDN) since 2002, you quickly get the sense that she’s someone who has weathered many battles on the frontlines for women’s equality, and that she doesn’t choose the easy fights. It’s like being with someone who wants you to understand the cold, hard truth of continued male dominance, while at the same time giving you a chance to consider what the future may hold if we keep trending in the right direction with women’s leadership.
“When I was at Rockefeller, I worked with a colleague, another woman, and the two of us were trying to get the Rockefeller Foundation to do a large international initiative on women and work, and it never really got off the ground. It’s one of the reasons that organizations like the Women Donors Network formed, to give women’s philanthropy its own place.”
Hall was an associate director with the Rockefeller Foundation before coming to WDN in 2002. She described how the Women Donors Network and other women’s giving networks provide a much-needed vehicle for women’s giving, unhampered by the big, unwieldy legacy foundations. In Hall’s view, the big foundations like Rockefeller, while significantly funding women’s issues over the years, have failed to take on women’s empowerment with the focus and resources needed for real change.
Hall believes a lot of the problem is due to the lack of women’s leadership in the top tier of big foundations, a statistic paralleled by the lack of women in leadership in nearly every major industry. Across the board, Hall says the research is quite consistent: Women rarely, if ever, break out of the 17 to 20 percent range of leadership in organizations—nonprofit, for-profit, or government. “Even if women are represented, they often don’t have a large enough number to influence the big decisions and directions of these institutions,” said Hall.
For the past 14 years, Hall has been steadily developing one of the largest networks of high-net-worth women in the U.S. The Women Donors Network sees itself as a “community with purpose,” and aims to affect a large swath of social issues. One of the biggest issues WDN is working on is impacting the national conversation about women, race, and political leadership, with the goal of changing the ratios of the leadership ranks to make them more representative.
The members of the Women Donors Network distribute over $200 million a year in grant funding, much of it through donor circles with focus areas including criminal justice, immigration, funding for progressive political infrastructure, and many other issues in between. It also funds three main initiatives, one of which is its Reflective Democracy campaign.
Hall is one of the guiding forces behind WDN’s Reflective Democracy campaign, which takes an intersectional approach to examining both racism and sexism, and the lack of representation for women and people of color in our political system.
After WDN unveiled the Who Leads Us? website, which offers a state-by-state breakdown of the gender and race of elected officials at every level of government across the state, Fox News reported that “Donna Hall is dangerous.” Making this kind of information available so that women and minorities can find out where they stand may be dangerous to the status quo, but it is very good for civic engagement and representative democracy.
The campaign’s groundbreaking analysis, Justice for All?, showed that 95 percent of elected prosecutors nationwide are white, a startling statistic that captured the attention of media outlets like Fortune and the New York Times, and reportedly created a palpable buzz at the American Bar Association Conference. It also released Who Runs (in) America?, exposing some of the many structural barriers that perpetuate our male-dominated political leadership.
As part of its strategy, the Reflective Democracy campaign has made grassroots grants across the country to better understand why women and people of color don’t get into office. Their research has identified four main barriers. “Number one is money at two levels,” said Hall. “Money to run, and money to take time off from work. Women can’t afford to take time off.”
Hall described the second barrier as the process of gatekeeping that occurs in establishment politics—”The quiet back-room meetings where they’re planning years in advance who they want to be in a particular spot when that spot opens up,” she said. The two other major barriers identified by the campaign are redistricting and access to voting. In 2015, WDN accepted proposals for systemic ways to address all of these barriers. Reflective Democracy’s budget last year was $1 million, and this year, WDN will put $1.4 million into continuing this work.
As another piece of WDN’s leadership for social change, Hall highlighted WDN’s support for UltraViolet, an organization that modeled itself on Moveon.org, but with a focused emphasis on gender equality. With several active campaigns on issues including equal pay, fair treatment for girls in schools, and the Flint water crisis, UltraViolet connects women’s empowerment directly to activism, helping to move from ideas to impact in the fight for gender equity.
Hall also wanted to talk about one other project that exemplifies WDN’s approach to social issues. “Some of the most impactful work we did early on was in response to Hurricane Katrina,” said Hall. Disaster relief is perhaps one of the world’s oldest forms of philanthropy, traditional and basic to the core, but the way Hall described WDN doing this work was anything but traditional.
Rather than going the route of joining with the American Red Cross or another dominant relief organization, WDN partnered with the 21st Century Foundation, which in 2005, was the only African-American endowed foundation, to raise more than $4.5 million over three years. Between 2005 and 2011, WDN helped to support more than 40 grassroots organizations in New Orleans and on the Gulf Coast. Hall shared this as an example of the nimbleness of WDN’s networks, and the breadth of issues they have taken on.
Hall is leading WDN with a strategy that faces squarely the power struggles that come with equality movements. Her organization is also taking on challenges facing humanity as a whole, providing a model for how to persevere, despite what often seem like insurmountable odds.
For Hall, diversity and an intersectional approach are key to the gender equity movement. “International examples have taught us that, once you have a sufficient number of women and people of color in elected offices in government, then everything else begins to roll down and change, but if you don’t have that diversity in place it’s going to be hard to change things,” she said. “Without a diversity of involvement, we can’t really get to where we want to go.”
Many of us are wondering on a daily basis what will happen to marginalized communities under a Trump administration. Now, the Women Donors Network and Solidaire are teaming up to do something with that concern: raise money to defend and include.
With a goal of raising $500,000 between now and Inauguration Day, January 20, The Emergent Fund will work to fund organizations that defend marginalized groups particularly threatened by a Trump presidency. The populations they will work to protect include “immigrants, women, Muslim and Arab-American communities, Black people, LGBT communities, and all people of color.”
From the press release:
We don’t know exactly what will come, but we must be prepared. We do know that there are strong leaders and organized movements on the ground in these communities, and we know that their work has been historically under-resourced. Now is the time for us to use our collective power to stand with them and support them in what they are doing, to listen to what they need, and to fund the new strategies that will emerge over the next 2-4 years.
Now is the time to give big and bold. Organizations like Cosecha are looking for additional funds to exponentially increase their ability to organize sanctuary cities and sanctuary campuses. Groups like MPower Change are doing communications work around the unconstitutionality of a Muslim registry, and building bridges between Muslim, immigrant, and Black communities.
I interviewed Donna Hall about the Women Donors Network this past year and was amazed at what this network of women funders is doing. The work of the Women Donors Network is particularly nimble and responsive to community concerns and emergencies, so it is great that they are forging the path on new funding to defend vulnerable people in the coming years.
Some big trends are happening in America for women, and these trends will likely be snowballing in the near future. The first trend: the growing financial muscle of women. The second: women’s growing leadership. Add to this mix the upward trajectory of women’s role in philanthropy, and you may have the makings of a paradigm shift.
In conversing with Debra Mesch, director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute, and Andrea Pactor, its associate director, I came away with a sense of how forces are aligning, now more than ever, for women to take the lead in philanthropy and beyond, and shape public policy for the common good.
Let’s review the case for women’s growing financial muscle. “Women are becoming the recipients of a massive transfer of wealth,” said Mesch. A quick review of the numbers: $10-million-plus, women-owned firms increased by 57 percent in 2013. Forty-five percent of American millionaires are now women, and 48 percent of estates worth more than $5 million are controlled by women. In 2013, an estimated 60 percent of high-net-worth women made their own fortunes, and by some estimates, as much as two-thirds of all wealth in the U.S. will be controlled by women by the year 2030.
And the case for women’s growing leadership? We are seeing more and more breakthroughs for women’s leadership across the board, from religion to politics, from business to nonprofit, from the household to the White House. Hillary Clinton is the most obvious example of the perfect nexus of women’s leadership and philanthropy, with her dual role as both a political and a philanthropic leader. This presidential race may yield the first female president, and it’s no accident that she has a strong history in philanthropy, a field that has been ahead of the curve in pushing for promising social policy changes for women for several decades.
Add to this the women in communities forming giving circles. Scholars in the field are calling this process “the democratization of philanthropy,” and the results of this massive cultural shift have yet to be fully realized.
But wait a minute. Let’s back up. Where did all this momentum for women and philanthropy come from? Andrea Pactor traces the study of gender and philanthropy back to the very practical pursuits of two leading women fundraisers. Sondra Shaw-Hardy and Martha Taylor, who started the National Network for Women as Philanthropists in 1991, perceived a critical difference in the way women approached giving. They also recognized a huge deficit in the field of fundraising that needed to be addressed—cultivating women donors.
“The two women (Shaw-Hardy and Taylor) who created this work did it not only to help women come into their own in philanthropy, but also to change the way fundraisers perceive donors,” said Pactor. “So this particular strand of women’s philanthropy study emanated from a very pragmatic approach to fundraising.”
Andrea Pactor, Associate Director, Women’s Philanthropy Institute
In 1997, the National Network for Women as Philanthropists became the Women’s Philanthropy Institute, and then became part of the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy in 2004. The program functioned mainly as a home base for the lectures and presentations that Shaw-Hardy and Taylor made about gender and philanthropy across the country, and why it was such an important factor in fundraising. In its early years, the program functioned primarily to provide donor education to women donors about their power and influence in philanthropy, and at the same time to guide fundraisers to engage women as donors.
Debra Mesch came on as director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute in 2008, and helped the Institute gain traction by establishing a volunteer leadership council. In 2010, WPI began its signature research series Women Give, and each year, this research has built out the picture a little more on how gender is influencing philanthropy, and what we can do to maximize the return on women’s positive influence. As we recently reported, that research just got a major boost from the Gates Foundation.
Mesch and Pactor both see a lot of transformation happening on the ground for women in philanthropy. “Pockets of very powerful women at the community and grassroots level are forming their own giving circles, their own collective giving models, their own modes of engaging in philanthropy, to make powerful changes in their own communities and across the globe,” said Mesch.
Pactor agrees that giving circles are not just a trend, but a cultural phenomenon that is growing steadily—and an important way in which people are participating in society, as people organize their own giving campaigns and groups for giving. “There are giving circles for everybody out there.” Pactor pointed to the Women’s Collective Giving Network, an association of 47 giving circles, with more than 10,000 women philanthropists in the mix.
Pactor also sees an important new development in the Prosperity Together Initiative, which launched in November 2015 and brings together 28 women’s funds and foundations to provide $118 million in funding for women and girls of color. “This represents a new direction for the women’s funds. What Prosperity Together did is, it reframed the conversation, and it took existing dollars and pooled them to get more traction and bandwidth.” Pactor sees this move significantly increasing the visibility of women’s funds, which work to address inequality for women and girls.
Pactor also sees great potential for the new generation of women leaders in philanthropy coming up through these women’s funds. “They are bringing a lot of new momentum and ideas, leaders like Jennifer Lockwood- Shabat at the Washington Area Women’s Foundation, Liz Vivian out of the Women’s Funding Alliance. These women have the potential to take the state women’s funds in new and important directions.” Pactor also talked about the strength of Lee Roper-Batker from the Women’s Foundation of Minnesota and Roslyn Dawson-Thompson of the Dallas Women’s Foundation, more longstanding leaders of the women’s funds who have laid the groundwork for the younger generation.
Mesch sees big things happening in the near future with our understanding of women’s role in giving at the micro-level—how individual households are influenced by their female members. “We know women are much more interested in the idea of legacy, and leaving a legacy to their children and grandchildren. That’s another area of potential new findings that will influence practice.”
Pactor and Mesch talked about the example of Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s giving, and how it has evolved since the couple’s marriage in 2012. “The recent giving that they have made, particularly in the Bay Area, to us, clearly reflects the research in the sense that she is a full partner in helping to craft their giving plan,” said Pactor. “We think that kind of high visibility of women’s role is another way that people like that will influence other people in their giving.”
Mesch also cited the giving of Bill and Melinda Gates as an example of a couple negotiating its philanthropic giving. She referenced Nicholas Kristof’s recent article on the 15th anniversary of the creation of the Gates Foundation, which describes how Melinda Gates has taken a stronger role recently in advocating for women to be central to the Gates’s giving.
“She [Melinda Gates] has a strong belief that giving to women and girls really makes an impact in the community, and changes the status of women and girls. She is a full partner with Bill, but she has also started her own track, now, on funding for women and philanthropy.”
And where do Mesch and Pactor see things going in the future for women and philanthropy? “Technology,” said Mesch. “Women seem to connect better with a lot of the technology around philanthropy, so we want to see where that can go in terms of further developing and amplifying giving.”
Pactor sees two other big trends: public policy and impact investing, both areas where women are becoming more strategic in terms of spending their money. “As more women come into philanthropy, they are realizing that they need to work on the legislative level and focus more on public policy.”
She also sees women as having an edge when it comes to reinventing philanthropy with financial tools like impact investing. “The concept of impact investing appeals to a lot of women,” she said. “So I think we’re going to hear a lot more from women about that.”
How great to see The Rhode Island Foundation embracing giving circles and offering to provide matching funds to six giving circles that meet their criteria. From the Foundation’s website:
The Rhode Island Foundation seeks up to six informed and engaged community leaders who are interested in forming, leading, and facilitating small groups of peer networks organized around charitable giving. Giving circles are groups of people who pool their donations and decide together how to distribute them. Groups typically have a shared interest or connection, but it’s not required. Individual giving circles will have the ability to set their own member requirements and giving levels.
Each circle will identify its own needs and design the appropriate goals and structure. This initiative is meant to inspire philanthropy throughout the community and to provide an opportunity for groups of people that might not otherwise come together around a fundraising effort – to do just that. It is not about giving to the Rhode Island Foundation. Likewise, the Rhode Island Foundation will not solicit gifts for your giving circle.
Today, Brooklyn Community Foundation announced $1.9 million in new grants through its Invest in Youth initiative, bringing the Foundation’s total funding for youth-serving nonprofits in Brooklyn to $2.3 million in 2016.
BCF launched its Invest in Youth initiative in 2015 as a 10-year, $25 million commitment to improve Brooklyn’s social and economic opportunities and outcomes for 16- to 24-year-olds, particularly young people of color.“We believe that a stronger and more equitable future for Brooklyn depends upon the success of its young people today—especially those who are growing up in our poorest communities.” said Brooklyn Community Foundation President and CEO Cecilia Clarke.
Many experts have argued that nothing is more important for global development than empowering women to play an equal role in all societies. Lately, that view has growing sway at the world’s biggest foundation.
Signs have been emerging for a while now that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is giving more attention to women’s empowerment, with Melinda leading this shift—while also becoming more independent in her philanthropy. This could be a very big deal over the long term.
Here are some of the tea leaves we’ve been reading.
First, Melinda Gates has recently raised her profile as a leader on women’s issues. In the past 18 months, she’s given interviews to several national media outlets, including Fortune and Elle, about her increasing focus on women’s empowerment, and authored an opinion piece for CNN about the need for more data on women. She even recently said she would like to see a woman become president. No clear endorsement here, but that’s a pretty big hint about how this powerful female leader sees the world. She is making more videos in which we hear her voice and see her face. She’s making it crystal clear that one of the richest women in the world is also a huge believer in women’s empowerment.
Second, Gates created her own unit at the foundation last year called Pivotal Ventures, which operates through her executive office. (Bill also has his own office, by the way, called bgc3.) According to Geekwire, she established the effort to “further her work on issues of gender inequity and women’s empowerment.” Pivotal Ventures has a number of staff members, including Haven D. Ley, who is senior director for program strategy. Ley has worked with Gates for a few years, and before that, she worked on the foundation’s agricultural development grantmaking. There, she led work focused on women in agriculture, which she once pointed out as a crucial issue: “The majority of farmers in the developing world are women working on plots of less than two hectares; it is women who produce food for most of the world’s poor people.” The foundation’s emphasis on gender-responsive agricultural development is one example of its growing work on women’s empowerment. Other examples include the creation in 2014 of a new Grand Challenge: “Putting Women and Girls at the Center of Development,” which the foundation described as an effort “to effectively reach and empower the most vulnerable women and girls to improve health and development—including economic—outcomes as well as gender equality.”
Third, Melinda Gates recently penned her own section of the Gates Annual Letter, separate from Bill, for the first time. Bill and Melinda have issued other letters together, but they mainly seemed to have Bill’s tone and subject focus. This year, Melinda carved out her own section in the 2016 letter, and devoted it to the concept of “time poverty” and how much unpaid work is done by the world’s women. This is probably something Melinda knows about firsthand, having just mothered three children nearly to adulthood, with the youngest, Rory, being 16. Now she has time (finally!) to speak to the world about how to work on the inequality caused by time poverty and its impact on women.
Fourth, the Gates Foundation has awarded big grants for data mining on women. Gates partnered with The Clinton Foundation in 2014 to fund No Ceilings and the Full Participation Project, the largest data research and analysis projects to date on the global status of women. On another front, Gates made a $2.1 million grant to the Women’s Philanthropy Institute last year to explore questions related to women and giving.
All this paints a picture of a different level of action and leadership from Melinda Gates on women’s issues. How much this shift might ultimately reshape the priorities of the world’s largest private foundation remains to be seen, but clearly, some changes have already been put in motion over the past year or two. We expect more going forward.
This is definitely a story worth watching closely.
Wow, impressive lineup for this event on January 12 in Southport, CT. Carolyn Miles, President and CEO of Save the Children, will be speaking, among other luminaries. Miles also spoke at the last Clinton Global Initiative winter meeting in February of 2016, which I attended to report on the No Ceilings project of The Clinton Foundation.
Many of these presenters will doubtlessly have interesting things to say about how women are influencing philanthropy — making it more collaborative, inclusive, and organically integrated into the economy, to name just a few of the changes that women bring to the field.
Public events and discussions like this will help women in philanthropy shift the conversation and shed light on this fast-growing movement. From the Fairfield Hamlet Hub:
Save the Children and Pequot Library present local philanthropic leaders discussing how women are changing the face of philanthropy and social entrepreneurship, on Thursday, January, 12, 2017 at 7:00pm in Pequot Library’s Auditorium.
Learn about ways you and your family can get involved and make a positive impact in our community and around the world. There will be an Introduction by Stephanie Coakley, Executive Director, Pequot Library, and Mike Tetreau, First Selectman, Town of Fairfield; the program is moderated by Bianna Golodryga, News & Finance Anchor, Yahoo!
The panelists include: Carolyn Miles, President and CEO, Save the Children; Susan Friedlaner Calzone, President and CEO, Foundation Source; Fiona Hodgson, VP for Development and Philanthropic Services, Fairfield County’s Communication Foundation; Emily Tow Jackson, Executive Director and President, Tow Foundation. There will be a wine and cheese reception to follow. For questions and additional information, please contact Amy Sinclair, firstname.lastname@example.org , (475) 999-3077.
We live in a world where the first thought about a piece of news needs to be: what is the source? With so much fake news and misinformation out there, the Knight Foundation is amping up its support of high quality community-driven media with new funding.
Jennifer Preston, Vice President of Journalism at the Knight Foundation spoke to Philanthropy Women this morning, the day of the launching of this new funding initiative.
She said most of those organizations receiving matching funds from this new initiative are Knight Foundation grantees from over the past three years. “Amid all of the concerns about fake news, supporting nonprofit journalism is a great way to address those concerns. Battle Fake news with smart news,” said Preston.
Preston talked about one of the grantees receiving matching funds called Philadelphia Public School Notebook, an independent reader-supported project that is important to parents and the education community at large in Philadelphia.
“The organizations receiving matching funds are news organizations serving local communities as well as those larger organizations like Pro Publica and the Marshall Project,” said Preston.
“The project launched this morning and is already getting traction on social media,” said Preston. She said the Knight Foundation is already getting emails from grantees and members of the community “that would put a smile on any funder’s face.” She said some of the non-profit outlets are already reporting getting thousand dollar donations today.
“We are hoping that the $1.5 million will provide incentive for non-profit news to expand their donor base and build that community that we know is important for journalism’s survival.”
“We are concerned about the historic low level of trust in the news media,” said Preston, and emphasized the importance for all journalists to focus on rebuilding that trust in the coming months and years. “That means engaging more directly with the community, using social media to listen more than broadcast content, and it means really involving the community in the news-gathering process.”
From the Knight Foundation’s press release:
Amid concerns about fake news, the decline of print media and the rise of unreliable sources of information, the Knight Foundation is launching its Knight News Match to provide $1.5 million in matching grants to nonprofit news organizations. The initiative will support individuals who are eager to contribute to a vibrant press using the proven success of matching campaigns. This is in keeping with the Foundation’s long-standing tradition of supporting high-quality journalism.
From December 19 through January 19, individuals can donate to help one or more of 59 nonprofit news organizations that will be eligible to receive up to $25,000 in matching funding. This includes prominent national organizations, local outlets that have long-served their communities, and others whose coverage will be crucial after this election season, such as:
The Center for Public Integrity, one of the country’s oldest and largest nonpartisan, nonprofit investigative news organizations, and winner of the 2014 Pulitzer Prize;
Inside Climate News, a Pulitzer Prize-winning, nonpartisan news organization dedicated to covering climate change, energy and the environment;
Michigan Radio, part of the NPR digital network and the state’s most listened-to public radio service.
Needless to say, this is just the kind of news we are very excited about here at Philanthropy Women. The need to support quality journalism has never been greater.
More information about how to donate and a list of the organizations receiving support is available here. Use hashtag #newsmatch to follow developments of the initiative online.